Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 106
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY Edited by:
Paper 207
Toricones: Burst Pressures J. Blachut1 and O. Ifayefunmi2
1School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
J. Blachut, O. Ifayefunmi, "Toricones: Burst Pressures", in , (Editors), "Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 207, 2014. doi:10.4203/ccp.106.207
Keywords: buckling, collapse, burst, external pressure, internal pressure, steel closures..
Summary
The paper describes burst pressures of eight mild steel toriconical shells of
laboratory scale. This is both a theoretical (numerical) and experimental study. All
test models were initially loaded by external pressure until they buckled/collapsed.
The toricones were subsequently internally pressurised until burst.
The details about the numerical process which simulates the two-stage loading
profile, i.e., starting with buckling by external pressure being followed by re-loading
using internal pressure for up to the burst, are given.
The paper concentrates on numerical procedure which allows computation of the
burst pressure using extensive plastic straining as a possible superior approach. It is
argued that burst pressure based on the excessive plastic straining is closer to reality
than the alternative approach based on plastic instability. The ratio of experimental
burst pressure to the finite element computed values was found to be [(1.35, 0.96),
(0.89, 0.92), (0.93, 0.90), (1.07, 0.95)] for four nominally identical pairs,
respectively. Alternative approach to the estimation of burst pressure, based on
plastic instability, gives the above ratio as [(0.79, 0.83), (0.77, 0.76), (0.74, 0.74),
(0.74, 0.75)]. Hence the plastic instability based burst significantly, and consistently,
overestimated experimental values. The proposed algorithm gave safe predictions
for two cases (1.35, 1.07) and in the remaining six the predictions were on unsafe
side (0.96, 0.89, 0.92, 0.93, 0.90, 0.95) but the disparity was not as bad as for the
plastic instability approach.
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|