Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239 CCC: 2
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY Edited by: B.H.V. Topping and P. Iványi
Paper 4.6
Multifidelity Domain-Aware Scheme for Cross-Regime Airfoil Shape Optimization F. Di Fiore and L. Mainini
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy F. Di Fiore, L. Mainini, "Multifidelity Domain-Aware Scheme for Cross-Regime Airfoil Shape Optimization", in B.H.V. Topping, P. Iványi, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK,
Online volume: CCC 2, Paper 4.6, 2022, doi:10.4203/ccc.2.4.6
Keywords: multifidelity method, domain-awareness, Bayesian optimization, active
learning, cross-regime, aerodynamic optimization.
Abstract
This paper proposes a domain-aware multifidelity scheme to speed-up the airfoil
shape optimization in a cross-regime scenario where the aerodynamic domain evolves
with the Mach number. Our strategy relies on a multifidelity Bayesian framework
based on a surrogate model iteratively updated through a multifidelity acquisition
function that selects the next design configuration and level of fidelity to query. We
implement the multifidelity Gaussian process as the aerodynamic surrogate model and
formulate an original domain-aware multifidelity acquisition function informed by the
evolution of the fluid domain. This property allows to wisely select the level of fidelity
of the aerodynamic model considering the compressibility and non-linear effects at
higher speed regimes, improving the accuracy of the surrogate model. We validate
our approach for the benchmark test-case of the constrained shape optimization
problem of a RAE 2822 airfoil. The results suggest that our strategy outperforms
popular multifidelity and single-fidelity methods reducing the drag coefficient of the
optimized airfoil with an improvement of the 24% respect to the baseline airfoil with
a limited computational budget.
download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 8 pages, 526 Kb)
go to the previous paper |
|