Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239 CCC: 9
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY Edited by: P. Iványi, J. Kruis and B.H.V. Topping
Paper 13.3
Addressing Material Softening and Strain Localization in Spatial Frame-Like Structures using Velocity-Based Beam Formulation S. Kusuma Chandrashekhara and D. Zupan
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia S. Kusuma Chandrashekhara, D. Zupan, "Addressing Material Softening and Strain Localization in Spatial Frame-Like Structures using Velocity-Based Beam Formulation", in P. Iványi, J. Kruis, B.H.V. Topping, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on
Computational Structures Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK,
Online volume: CCC 9, Paper 13.3, 2024, doi:10.4203/ccc.9.13.3
Keywords: strong discontinuity, material softening, post-critical analysis, strain localisation, statics and dynamics, three-dimensional rotations.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a computational framework capable of addressing the challenges of material softening and strain localization in spatial frame-like structures. By following an alternative non-local approach and the method of embedded strong discontinuity within the original velocity-based finite element formulation, we enable the framework to identify critical load levels and critical cross-sections accurately and describe the phenomenon of strain localisation effectively. The strong discontinuity-based approach involves introducing additional jump-like variables at the level of interpolated velocities and angular velocities. These variables are governed by additional equilibrium equations at the critical cross-section, derived using the weighted residual method. Our methodology is effective for both quasi-static and dynamic analysis. The numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed methodologies while also showing a comparison of results between the two approaches within the same underlying beam formulation.
download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 1575 Kb)
go to the previous paper |
|