Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239
CCC: 9
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY
Edited by: P. Iványi, J. Kruis and B.H.V. Topping
Paper 13.3

Addressing Material Softening and Strain Localization in Spatial Frame-Like Structures using Velocity-Based Beam Formulation

S. Kusuma Chandrashekhara and D. Zupan

University of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Full Bibliographic Reference for this paper
S. Kusuma Chandrashekhara, D. Zupan, "Addressing Material Softening and Strain Localization in Spatial Frame-Like Structures using Velocity-Based Beam Formulation", in P. Iványi, J. Kruis, B.H.V. Topping, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK, Online volume: CCC 9, Paper 13.3, 2024, doi:10.4203/ccc.9.13.3
Keywords: strong discontinuity, material softening, post-critical analysis, strain localisation, statics and dynamics, three-dimensional rotations.

Abstract
In this paper, we propose a computational framework capable of addressing the challenges of material softening and strain localization in spatial frame-like structures. By following an alternative non-local approach and the method of embedded strong discontinuity within the original velocity-based finite element formulation, we enable the framework to identify critical load levels and critical cross-sections accurately and describe the phenomenon of strain localisation effectively. The strong discontinuity-based approach involves introducing additional jump-like variables at the level of interpolated velocities and angular velocities. These variables are governed by additional equilibrium equations at the critical cross-section, derived using the weighted residual method. Our methodology is effective for both quasi-static and dynamic analysis. The numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed methodologies while also showing a comparison of results between the two approaches within the same underlying beam formulation.

download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 1575 Kb)

go to the previous paper
go to the next paper
return to the table of contents
return to the volume description