Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Computational Science, Engineering & Technology Series
ISSN 1759-3158 CSETS: 35
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY Edited by: B.H.V. Topping and P. Iványi
Chapter 5
Simple Homogenization Models for the Limit and Non-Linear Analysis of Masonry Structures Loaded In- and Out-of-Plane G. Milani
Department of Architecture, Built Environment, and Construction Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy G. Milani, "Simple Homogenization Models for
the Limit and Non-Linear Analysis of
Masonry Structures Loaded In- and Out-of-Plane", in B.H.V. Topping and P. Iványi, (Editor), "Computational Methods for Engineering Technology", Saxe-Coburg Publications, Stirlingshire, UK, Chapter 5, pp 111-133, 2014. doi:10.4203/csets.35.5
Keywords: masonry, homogenization, limit analysis, non-linear range, upper and
lower bound theorems, collapse loads.
Summary
The paper addresses the capabilities of kinematic and static models of masonry
homogenization in the prediction of both the non-linear behaviour and the
homogenized strength domains for in- and out-of-plane loads. The first approach is
based on an equilibrated polynomial expansion of the micro-stress field into
rectangular sub-domains within the elementary cell. The second is again a model
based on equilibrium, and relies on an coarse finite element (FE) discretization of
the unit cell through triangular elements with constant stress field (CST), where
mortar joints are reduced to interfaces with frictional behavior and limited strength
in tension and compression. The extension to out-of-plane loads is handled by
means of a standard integration of the micro-stress field along the thickness. The
generalization to the non-linear range is also very straightforward. The third
procedure is a kinematic identification strategy, where joints are reduced to
interfaces and bricks are assumed infinitely resistant. The last model is again a
kinematic procedure based on the so called Method of Cells (MoC), where the
Representative Element of Volume (REV) subdivided into six rectangular cells with
pre-assigned polynomial fields of periodic-velocity. The first and latter models have
the advantage that the reduction of joints to interfaces is not required. The second
approach, albeit reduces joints to interfaces, still allows the consideration of failure
inside bricks. The third approach is the most straightforward, but is reliable only in
the case of thin joints and strong blocks. At a cell level, a critical comparison of pros
and cons of all models is discussed, with reference to real cases.
purchase the full-text of this chapter (price £20)
go to the previous chapter |
|