Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 112
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED, GPU AND CLOUD COMPUTING FOR ENGINEERING Edited by:
Paper 19
Domain decomposition methods in special geotechnical problems J. Kruis and T. Koudelka
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Republic J. Kruis, T. Koudelka, "Domain decomposition methods in special geotechnical
problems", in , (Editors), "Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, GPU and Cloud Computing for Engineering", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 19, 2019. doi:10.4203/ccp.112.19
Keywords: FETI, slope stability.
Summary
Slope stability, limit load and other geotechnical problems are examples of tasks, where
specific numerical methods and models are needed. The source of difficulties stems from
the soil behaviour which is very complex and there is usually lack of required input data.
This contribution concerns with a special numerical technique for the description of slope
stability and eventual landslide based on domain decomposition methods, namely on the FETI
method. The main advantage of the FETI method is the presence of rigid body modes of
particular subdomains which can be very efficiently used for description of sliding part of
soil. The first step in the analysis is a classical slope analysis on a reasonably coarse mesh
which should reveal the failure surface. In the second step, finer mesh is used and the mesh is
decomposed into subdomains with respect to the failure surface. If the failure surface on the
finer mesh coincides with the failure surface obtained on the coarser mesh, the limit load can
be determined. Otherwise, the failure surface is changed and new decomposition of the finer
mesh is needed. All calculations on the finer mesh can be done in parallel. Special attention
should be devoted to load balancing because only few finite elements describe a zone with
plastic behaviour while all other finite elements are in the elastic zone. Clearly, the number
of arithmetic operations on elements with nonlinear plastic behaviour is much higher than the
number of operations on elements where elastic response occur.
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £22)
go to the previous paper |
|