Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 108
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING COMPUTING Edited by: J. Kruis, Y. Tsompanakis and B.H.V. Topping
Paper 234
The Buckling, under External Lateral and Axial Pressure, of Ten Conical Steel Shells C.T.F. Ross1, J. Blachut2, T. Gilbert1 and T. Lawson1
1University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
C.T.F. Ross, J. Blachut, T. Gilbert, T. Lawson, "The Buckling, under External Lateral and Axial Pressure, of Ten Conical Steel Shells", in J. Kruis, Y. Tsompanakis, B.H.V. Topping, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 234, 2015. doi:10.4203/ccp.108.234
Keywords: buckling, conical shells, finite element, ANSYS, ABAQUS, BOSOR5, nonlinear analyses.
Summary
The aim of the study, described in this paper, was to computationally analyse the
experimental results of buckling tests, carried out on carefully machined steel cones
subjected to combined axial and lateral pressure. Ten steel cones were tested
experimentally and all were analysed in this paper; two with just under external
lateral pressure, two with just under external axial pressure and six with combined
axial and lateral pressure. The computer program ANSYS was used to simulate the
practical experiments, for the first time; conducting Eigen-buckling and non-linear
buckling analyses on each of the ten conical shells. The experimental results were
obtained from previous testing. ANSYS produced results similar to the experiments
showing that the majority of the cones failed as a result of shell instability. The
nonlinear plastic buckling results calculated using ANSYS were also accurate for
the majority of cones. The nonlinearity analyses included material and geometrical
nonlinearity. Two other design codes were also used to compare with the
experimental values; namely ABAQUS and BOSOR5; but these programs could not
replicate the high levels of accuracy to the same degree as that demonstrated by
ANSYS. The result of this paper demonstrate that ANSYS could be a realistic
alternative to physical testing, and also proved to be modestly more accurate than
ABAQUS and BOSOR5.
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|