Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 104
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE Edited by: J. Pombo
Paper 219
Using Analytical Target Cascading to Improve Ultra-light Railway Vehicle Ride Comfort D. Silva1, M.M. Neves1, V. Infante2 and P. Koziol3
1Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
D. Silva, M.M. Neves, V. Infante, P. Koziol, "Using Analytical Target Cascading to Improve Ultra-light Railway Vehicle Ride Comfort", in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 219, 2014. doi:10.4203/ccp.104.219
Keywords: ultra-light railway vehicle, ride comfort, analytical target cascading, optimization, rail irregularities.
Summary
Analytical target cascading (ATC) is a hierarchical systems optimization method
that works by decomposing a system into a hierarchy of subsystems and
coordinating the optimization of subsystems so that the joint solution is consistent
and optimal for the overall system. In this paper, the authors describe the research
developed in a basic problem to review the ATC approach for large-scale complex
systems and its application to the design and optimization of an ultra-light railway
vehicle (URV) in terms of comfort. A dynamic model of the URV is presented and
parameterized in terms of its stiffness and damping masses. ATC is employed to
decompose and optimize the vertical passive suspensions in terms of comfort when
it travels at constant speed on railway tracks with vertical irregularities described by
power spectral density functions. The system partition and hierarchical integration
of the model are addressed. The problem is discussed and the application of the
ATC to the analysis of the vertical ride comfort of the URV is performed. The
authors also present a comparison of the performance between the ATC approach
and a standard optimization approach that considers all systems in one problem
discussing the advantages of ATC in dealing with complex problems.
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|