Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 88
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY Edited by: B.H.V. Topping and M. Papadrakakis
Paper 38
Vibration and Wave Propagation Approaches Applied to Assess Damage Influence on the Behavior of Euler-Bernoulli Beams: Part I Direct Problem K.M. Fernandes, L.T. Stutz, R.A. Tenenbaum and A.J. Silva Neto
Polytechnic Institute, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil K.M. Fernandes, L.T. Stutz, R.A. Tenenbaum, A.J. Silva Neto, "Vibration and Wave Propagation Approaches Applied to Assess Damage Influence on the Behavior of Euler-Bernoulli Beams: Part I Direct Problem", in B.H.V. Topping, M. Papadrakakis, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 38, 2008. doi:10.4203/ccp.88.38
Keywords: structural damage, vibration, wave propagation, damage influence, flexibility matrix, parametric identification.
Summary
The damage influence on the vibrational behavior and on the wave
propagation issues of a slender Euler-Bernoulli beam is
investigated. In the vibration framework, the damage is assessed
by considering changes in the reduced flexibility matrix of the
structure. In the wave propagation framework, the presence of
damage is perceived by an early echo output. A slender aluminium
beam with an imposed damage scenario is considered for the numerical
analysis. Both approaches showed a sensitivity to damage that
enables these two techniques to be applied for damage
identification purposes. Many vibration based damage
identification approaches presented in the literature are built on
the general framework of the finite element model (FEM) updating
methods. These methods are intended to identify structural damage
through determining changes in some parameters of a FEM of the
structure. Hence, the damage identification problem may be cast as
a minimization one and a set of parameters are sought in order to
minimize an error function. This error is defined as the
difference between some matrices of the FEM of the undamaged
structure and the corresponding ones obtained from a modal testing
of the damage structure. The basic idea of these approaches is
that the modal properties (frequencies, mode-shapes and modal
damping) are functions of the physical properties of the structure
(mass, stiffness and damping) and changes in the physical
properties due to damage will be reflected in the modal
characteristics, which can be measured and used to infer about the
damage. Damage identification can be also seen from the point of
view of the wave propagation approach. Although this approach is
much more uncommon in the literature than the vibration one, it has
the advantage of being a fast technique of good accuracy.
Some applications are reported in the fields of geophysics,
medical ultrasonics, and non-destructive tests. The main goal of
this research is to develop damage identification techniques based
on the two approaches and compare them in terms of practice,
accuracy and robustness. Initially, a simple damage imposed on an
Euler-Bernoulli slender beam will be considered. Although having
the inverse problem in mind, the concern here is to
comparatively solve the analysis problem and study the sensitivity
of each method to structural damage. Some numerical results
showing the error with regard to a homogeneous beam response
introduced by a damage, using both techniques, are reported. In a
companion paper, the damage assessment using combined (hybrid)
identification techniques for the vibration and wave propagation
approaches is discussed.
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|