Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 85
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTEENTH UK CONFERENCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS IN ENGINEERING Edited by: B.H.V. Topping
Paper 3
Stochastic Structural Optimisation with Quadratic Loss Functions K. Marti
Aero-Space Engineering and Technology, Federal Armed Forces University Munich, Neubiberg/Munich, Germany K. Marti, "Stochastic Structural Optimisation with Quadratic Loss Functions", in B.H.V. Topping, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Fifteenth UK Conference of the Association of Computational Mechanics in Engineering", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 3, 2007. doi:10.4203/ccp.85.3
Keywords: limit load/shakedown analysis, structural analysis and design, random model parameters, robust decisions, quadratic loss functions, deterministic substitute problems, stochastic nonlinear programming.
Summary
Problems from plastic analysis and optimal plastic design are based
on the convex, linear or linearised yield/ strength condition and the
linear equilibrium equation for the stress (state) vector. In
practice one has to take into account stochastic variations of the
model parameters (e.g. yield stresses, plastic capacities, external
load factors, cost factors, etc.), see e.g. [2,3,4].
Hence, in order to get robust
optimal load factors, robust optimal designs, resp., the basic
plastic analysis or optimal plastic design problem with random
parameters must be replaced by an appropriate deterministic
substitute problem, cf. [1]. Instead of calculating approximatively
the probability of failure/survival based on a certain choice of
(approximate) failure modes, a direct approach is proposed based on
the primary costs (weight, volume, costs of construction, costs for
missing carrying capacity, etc.) and the recourse costs (e.g. costs
for repair, compensation for weakness within the structure, damage,
failure, etc.). Based on the mechanical survival conditions of
plasticity theory, a quadratic error/loss criterion is developed. The
minimum recourse costs can be determined then by solving an
optimisation problem having a quadratic objective function and linear
constraints. For each vector a=a(w) of model parameters and each
design vector x one obtains then an explicit representation of the
"best" internal load distribution F*. Moreover, also the expected
recourse costs can be determined explicitly. The expected recourse function
may be represented by means of a "generalised stiffness matrix". Hence,
corresponding to an elastic approach, the expected recourse function can be
interpreted here as a "generalised expected compliance function". Based on
the minimisation of the expected primary costs subject to constraints for the
expected recourse costs ("generalised compliance") or the minimisation of
the expected total primary and recourse costs, explicit finite dimensional
parameter optimisation problems result - as deterministic substitute problems
- for finding robust
optimal design x*, a maximal load factor,
respectively. The analytical properties of the resulting programming
problem are discussed, and applications, such as limit
load/shakedown analysis, are considered.
References
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|