Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 80
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY Edited by: B.H.V. Topping and C.A. Mota Soares
Paper 84
Axi-Symmetric Supersonic Ejector for High Exit Pressure N. Kameda, E. Spiegler and M. Wolfshtein
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel N. Kameda, E. Spiegler, M. Wolfshtein, "Axi-Symmetric Supersonic Ejector for High Exit Pressure", in B.H.V. Topping, C.A. Mota Soares, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 84, 2004. doi:10.4203/ccp.80.84
Keywords: supersonic turbulent flow, ejector pump, hysteresis, flow conditions.
Summary
The paper is concerned with supersonic turbulent flow inside an ejector pump.
Usually such devices are used to pump large fluid volumes at low pressure-ratio
between the inlet and outlet of the ejector. In the present study the opposite case of
very high total outlet pressure relative to the secondary inlet stagnation pressure and
very low flow rates is examined. Such an ejector may be used to generate very high
vacuum. The motivation for this research came from a study of the generation of
hydrogen by dissociation of very hot water vapor under very high vacuum into
hydrogen and oxygen, where the ejector is the only device which can pump the very
hot fluids used in the process.
The goals of the study are to (i) To understand the structure of the flow; (ii) To identify the important mechanisms affecting this flow; (iii) To seek the upper limits of the pressure ratio possible in such devices. The flow inside a supersonic ejector is rather complicated, with systems of shock waves, expansion waves and separation bubbles prevailing inside the ejector. A separation bubble near the exit from the primary nozzle grows when the pressure ratio increases until it completely blocks the ejector. Thus conditions of zero flow rate or even reverse flow rate can occur. In some cases unsteady flow develops, which may be harmful to structural elements. The problem was attacked using a commercial flow solver (INCA). The procedure chosen was to apply a time-like iterative procedure until a steady state was reached. Usually the solution of a previous run was chosen as an initial condition. It turned out that the direction of change of the parameters had a significant effect on the results for some values of the parameters. In such cases the choice of high initial primary stagnation pressure gave different result from a choice of low initial primary stagnation pressure. Thus the problem appears to have non-unique solutions, and the process exhibits hysteresis. Therefore the problem is of interest to the theoretician who is interested in the conditions generating this phenomenon, and to the engineer who needs to ensure certain performance of the device. The results suggest two mechanisms for physical instability of this flow:
Both these cases may pose great difficulties to the mechanical designers due to periodic fluctuations of the stresses inside the structure. On the other hand, the development of any of theses solutions is highly sensitive to boundary conditions, and the reliability of the solution depends on very careful numerical treatment. It may be pointed out that reliability of the solution in such cases relies heavily on the numerical accuracy and on the validity of the turbulence model chosen. The major conclusions are
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|