Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|||||||||
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 79
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGY Edited by: B.H.V. Topping and C.A. Mota Soares
Paper 75
Mechanical Approach of Plasticity in the Presence of Damage R. Souchet
Association Française de Mécanique, Buxerolles, France R. Souchet, "Mechanical Approach of Plasticity in the Presence of Damage", in B.H.V. Topping, C.A. Mota Soares, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 75, 2004. doi:10.4203/ccp.79.75
Keywords: large strain, plasticity, damage, effective stress.
Summary
If the plasticity without damage is well modelised in large strains [1], the
plasticity in the presence of damage has not received a satisfactory framework.
Moreover, many studies are restricted to small strains [2]. We recall that a general
approach consists in the exclusive use of the Thermodynamics of Irreversible
Processes [3,4]. But a more specific approach is based on the concept of effective
stress, that introduces a fictitious elastoplastic material in order to compare the
elasto-plastic damaged real material and this virtual undamaged one. The main aim
of this paper is to give a coherent framework and to point out some limitations of
this mechanical approach, by defining with accuracy notions such accompanying
body, elastic strain correlation and effective stress.
Our first step. We define a referential body , accompanying the real body , as a virtual body used for mathematical supports only. This virtual body may possess some microstructure and so does not satisfy to Classical Continuum hypotheses, particularly the symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor and the compatibility conditions. Furthermore, its definition may introduce some internal parameters unaware of its companion real body . Since we are concerned by local constitutive laws, it is sufficient to compare the local maps, and , by , [5]. However this new parameter cannot be an internal variable, since is related to both reversible and irreversible mechanical processes. Our second step. To overcome this difficulty, the material elements are elastically unloaded [6] by , the respective elastic maps. So, the maps and are concerned by irreversible effects only. A comparison between the "intermediate configurations" and can be made by , as for and . A priori, can be viewed as an internal parameter connected with some irreversible microscopic changes only. Now since , we can write the decompositions of the deformation gradients and the velocity field as also proposed by an other method [7]. Finally, as is a plastic term only, it is assumed that the internal parameter describes some permanent (under zero stress) geometric changes due to damaging effects [8]. Our third step. A comparison between the stress levels requires a rule of comparison between the elastic strains and , defined by an elastic strain correlation . Then the elimination of strains between the elastic laws and gives a relation between stresses noted . Reciprocally, if , and are known, we can obtain the real elastic law as ( is the Cauchy stress tensor). The fictitious stress is said the "effective stress" associate to the elastic strain correlation . The functions are often obtained by inverse methods and depend on internal damage parameters. Our fourth step. If the functions are known, the transfer of the elastic range, i.e. loading surface and elastic law, is generally achieved. Concerning the evolution laws of plastic parameters, it turns out that the evolution laws depend on all parameters of the virtual body and some of them may be irrelevant of the actual problems. This presence is a theoretical limitation on the use of the method. References
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|||||||||