Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Proceedings
ISSN 1759-3433 CCP: 77
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING COMPUTING Edited by: B.H.V. Topping
Paper 23
Modified Versions of QMR-Type Methods M.D. García, E. Flórez, A. Suárez, L. González and G. Montero
University Institute of Intelligent Systems and Numerical Applications in Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain , "Modified Versions of QMR-Type Methods", in B.H.V. Topping, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Civil and Structural Engineering Computing", Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 23, 2003. doi:10.4203/ccp.77.23
Keywords: nonsymmetric linear systems, sparse matrices, Krylov subspace methods, quasi-minimal residual methods,.
Summary
The quasi-minimal residual methods, these are QMR (Freund and
Nachtigal [3]), TFQMR (Freund [4]) and
QMRCGSTAB (Chan et al [1]), are biorthogonalization methods for solving nonsymmetric linear systems of equations which improve the irregular behaviour of BiCG, CGS and BiCGSTAB algorithms [6], respectively. They are based on the quasi-minimization of the residual using the standard Givens rotations that lead to methods with short term recurrences.
In this paper, the quasi-minimization problem is solved using a similar procedure to that developed in [5] for the minimization problem arising in GMRES method. It consists of a direct solver which provides new versions of QMR-type methods, the so called modified QMR methods (MQMR). MQMR algorithms have different convergence behaviour in finite arithmetic although are equivalent to the standard ones in exact arithmetic. The new implementations not only reduce the number of iterations but also reach convergence in some cases where the standard algorithms do not work well. On the other hand, we study the effect of preconditioning, for example with Jacobi, ILU, SSOR or sparse approximate inverse [7], and reordering [2] on the performance of these algorithms is studied. Finally, some numerical experiments are solved in order to compare the results obtained by standard and modified algorithms. References
purchase the full-text of this paper (price £20)
go to the previous paper |
|