Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239 CCC: 6
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING COMPUTING Edited by: P. Ivanyi, J. Kruis and B.H.V. Topping
Paper 9.1
On failure of ceramic restorative crowns under mastication loads M. Ashrafi1,2 and M. Doblare1,2,3,4
1Aragon Institute of Engineering Research, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza,
Spain
M. Ashrafi, M. Doblare, "On failure of ceramic restorative crowns
under mastication loads", in P. Ivanyi, J. Kruis, B.H.V. Topping, (Editors), "Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on
Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing", Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK,
Online volume: CCC 6, Paper 9.1, 2023, doi:10.4203/ccc.6.9.1
Keywords: dental ceramics, crown fracture, mastication loading, XFEM.
Abstract
Ceramics used as restorations in dental crowns are extensively used due to their aesthetic
result and corrosion resistance. However, they may fail under usual loads due
to intrinsic britleness of ceramic materials. This is especially likely in the posterior
region where occlusal forces can lead to deterioration of the dental crowns. This study
aims at investigating the behavior of different ceramic used for dental crowns. This
analysis is performed by means of numerical modeling using the extended finite element
method that allows to follow the evolution of the crack appearance and propagation.
For this purpose, a three-dimensional finite element model of the mandible
and all its components was developed. Then, we compared the behavior of different
materials usually used for dental restorations such as Feldspar ceramic (FC),
Hybrid high-performance polymer composite resin (HPP), Lithium disilicate (LDS),
Polymer-infiltrated ceramics (PIC), and Yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Zr). All
of them were also compared with enamel. Also, we considered two ways for loading
the occlusal antagonist surfaces: (i) by applying the displacement on the surface of
the first molar; (ii) by applying tooth-to-tooth contact. Zr did not damage in any of
both models, while other materials fractured. It can be concluded that Zr, according to the assumptions of this study, is more resistant to occlusal forces than other ceramic
materials used in dental restorations.
download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 2840 Kb)
go to the previous paper |
|