Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239
CCC: 1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE
Edited by: J. Pombo
Paper 13.2

Energy Impact of Different Intra-Platoon Spacing Policies for Virtually-Coupled Trains Sets

R. Parise1, M. Schenker2 and H. Dittus 2

1German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Vehicle Concepts Berlin, Germany
2German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Vehicle Concepts Stuttgart, Germany

Full Bibliographic Reference for this paper
R. Parise, M. Schenker, H. Dittus, "Energy Impact of Different Intra-Platoon Spacing Policies for Virtually-Coupled Trains Sets", in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance", Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK, Online volume: CCC 1, Paper 13.2, 2022, doi:10.4203/ccc.1.13.2
Keywords: virtually coupled train-sets, VCTS, energy optimization.

Abstract
Virtually-coupled train sets (VCTS) is a new railway operation concept that allows trains to drive together in a harmonized fashion without a physical connection, similar to a platoon of road vehicles. Since the distance between trains is not necessarily fixed (in contrast to mechanically connected trains), VCTS may get a small time advantage every time there is a change in the speed limit of the track. This paper analyses the time difference between mechanically coupled trains and VCTS using two different inter-vehicular distancing policy (namely constant gap (CDG) and constant headway (CTH)). The analysis is carried out analytically for a simple track for sake of visualization, and numerically on a virtual but representative regional track. The results show that the time advantage for CDG policy non-negligible, while the CTH performs worse than its mechanical counterpart. This report shows also that the time advantage can be converted into energy reduction in the range from 2-12% by allowing trains to drive slower while respecting the same timetable.

download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 8 pages, 577 Kb)

go to the previous paper
go to the next paper
return to the table of contents
return to the volume description