Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239 CCC: 1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE Edited by: J. Pombo
Paper 8.8
Ballasted Track Lateral Resistance Estimation by Discrete Element Method Simulations M. Wone1, A. Idrissi-Hakkouni2 and J.-F. Ferellec1
1SNCF Réseau, Saint-Denis, France M. Wone, A. Idrissi-Hakkouni, J.-F. Ferellec, "Ballasted Track Lateral Resistance Estimation by
Discrete Element Method Simulations", in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance",
Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK,
Online volume: CCC 1, Paper 8.8, 2022, doi:10.4203/ccc.1.8.8
Keywords: ballasted track, lateral resistance, ballast shoulder, simulation,
discrete element method, model calibration.
Abstract
In this work, discrete elements methods (DEM) were used to simulate ballasted
track lateral resistance problems by representing a granular material such as ballast
as an assembly of rigid grains interacting through contact laws that contain
micromechanical physics relevant for the material. Macro-mechanical properties,
such as global resistance of the ballast bed, are then seen as a consequence of the
collective dynamics of the assembly. A large number of lateral resistance tests
simulations were run to find optimal value for frictional parameters so that
experimentally measured values for various track configurations were satisfyingly
found. The model was then used to explore the lateral track resistance of
experimentally untested configurations, namely standard profiles and nonstandard
ballast profile alike, for instance no shoulder, reinforced shoulder, “infinite”
shoulder or walls. By varying the length and height of the shoulder, we could predict
how much one can enhance the lateral resistance by adding more ballast on the side
of the track, and what geometry is optimal for profile reinforcement in term of
ballast quantity, while respecting security constraints toward lateral efforts due to
potential rail buckling.
download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 517 Kb)
go to the previous paper |
|