Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications |
|
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239 CCC: 1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE Edited by: J. Pombo
Paper 4.8
The Digitalisation of Railway Pantograph- Catenary System for Predicting Dynamic Performance Based on Recurrent Neural Network Y. Song1, H. Wang2, P. Navik1 and A. Ronnquist1
1Department of Structural Engineering, Norwegian University of
Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway Y. Song, H. Wang, P. Navik, A. Ronnquist, "The Digitalisation of Railway Pantograph-
Catenary System for Predicting Dynamic
Performance Based on Recurrent Neural Network", in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance",
Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK,
Online volume: CCC 1, Paper 4.8, 2022, doi:10.4203/ccc.1.4.8
Keywords: high-speed railway, pantograph-catenary interaction, deep learning,
LSTM, contact force, digital model.
Abstract
In high-speed rail operations, the interaction performance of the pantograph-catenary
system is of great importance as it directly determines the current collection quality
and operational safety of the high-speed train. In this work, addressing the tremendous
computational cost of the finite element method (FEM), a digital tool for fast
simulations of pantograph-catenary interaction, is proposed using the deep learning
technique. A dataset containing 30000 cases of pantograph-catenary interaction is
generated by a mature FE model. An LSTM-based neural network is proposed to
handle the inherent nonlinearity between the input model parameters and the output
contact force. The analysis of the prediction performance indicates that the contact
forces predicted by the digital model and FEM have high similarity, but the
computational efforts of the proposed digital model can be neglected. The statistical
analysis points out that almost all the prediction results have an error of less than
5.75% in terms of the contact force standard deviation.
download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 7 pages, 521 Kb)
go to the previous paper |
|