Computational & Technology Resources
an online resource for computational,
engineering & technology publications
Civil-Comp Conferences
ISSN 2753-3239
CCC: 7
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE
Edited by: J. Pombo
Paper 13.8

Performance Comparison of the Forward and Inverse Metawedge for Ground-Borne Vibration Mitigation

A.B. Fărăgău1, S. Van Gaal2, E. Vlijm2, A.V. Metrikine1, A. Tsouvalas1 and K.N. van Dalen1

1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
2Cohere Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands

Full Bibliographic Reference for this paper
A.B. Fărăgău, S. Van Gaal, E. Vlijm, A.V. Metrikine, A. Tsouvalas, K.N. van Dalen, "Performance Comparison of the Forward and Inverse Metawedge for Ground-Borne Vibration Mitigation", in J. Pombo, (Editor), "Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance", Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, UK, Online volume: CCC 7, Paper 13.8, 2024, doi:10.4203/ccc.7.13.8
Keywords: ground-borne vibration, vibration mitigation, metamaterials, metawedge, railway-induced vibration, wave propagation.

Abstract
This study examines the impact of railway-induced ground-borne vibrations on nearby structures and residents, focusing on the effectiveness of the metawedge, a novel mitigation measure. The metawedge consists of a series of periodically arranged resonators along the propagation path, either placed on the ground surface or embedded at various depths. Unlike classical locally-resonant metamaterials, the metawedge features resonators with smoothly varying resonance frequencies in the longitudinal direction. Two metawedge designs, the forward and inverse metawedge, have been proposed in the literature. Despite their similarities, they operate on different principles: the forward metawedge decelerates incoming surface waves, localizing energy, while the inverse metawedge accelerates the waves, converting Rayleigh waves into body waves. This study compares the performance of both designs in mitigating train-induced ground-borne vibrations. Results indicate that both the forward and inverse metawedge exhibit remarkably similar performance for the specific design adopted. If this similarity holds across different designs, it offers engineers flexibility in choosing the appropriate measure based on practical needs. More generally, this work demonstrates the potential and feasibility of using metamaterials to address current and future challenges in railway transportation.

download the full-text of this paper (PDF, 12 pages, 1436 Kb)

go to the previous paper
go to the next paper
return to the table of contents
return to the volume description